The gathering of the farcical storm . Contrarian essays no 24

1. A favorite question often asked by Anwar is, when you were in power, what did you do?

2. This is the test of anyone in power. Is the power used for the common good?

3. Very often, when the question is asked, what we get are excuses why xyz cannot be done. Change, it is said needed time. Yes, I've got to answer the call of natural dulu.

4. You don't start, it won't be done. There's always the whisper of the devil- retain the status quo, enjoy power, taste the spoils of war.

5. In the end, you end up with the opposite of what you promised to do.

6. It will exactly be as the great economist Milton Friedman said. You end up with the exact opposite results than the good intentions the sponsors started with.

7. Yes, we are all promised that ' a change is gonna come. But as the other part of the slogan that James carville says, it's more of the same.

8. I would have liked that the question of whether bro Anwar is the change agent that he sets out to do?

9. Not doing so, or giving excuses that reformasi ought to be slow and temperate is a load of crap .

10. Not doing so betrays the faith of people have in you. And as lee kuan yew said in an interview with Charlie Rose, that affects your political longevity.

11. If Anwar is complacent about it or suffers from the edifying effects of being in power, the next GE is for him to lose. He will be a one trick pony . That is something I want to avoid.

12. Unfortunately the PKR people are living in their own Dreamworld, perhaps because of taking in too much ketum.

13. In general, all of them poohed poohed the threats against Anwar. They will rue the day they did so .

14. I have a problem here. The supreme leader is surrounded by bloody fools and yes men .

15. Not only do they shy away from reminding Kim IL Anwar that he has strayed from the reformasi agenda, they infact exacerbate anwars illusion of invincibility by saying he can do no wrong.

16. I see some of these apple polishers putting up picture posters of the great leader everywhere. On these picture posters, Anwar looked uncannily like Lenin. Others say all the threats to Anwar including the gathering on 26th July, do not pose any dangers to Anwar.

17. Sure,carry on believing your own hype fellers. You'll be the first to bite the dust.

18. It's wishful thinking at its best. These people think just thinking of the desired ending, it will be so. Hoi dumbasses, the desired end requires skunk work la.

19. There is such thing as free lunch.

20. The presence of the apple-polishers, bootlickers and sycophants is damaging Anwar. They prevent him from seeing the truth. The are not reality checkers but dream builders.

21. Such as building false narratives about the 26 July gathering.

21(b). Like downplaying and loudly disputing the size of the gathering.

22. Everyone knows that in matters like these, the official government apparatchiks suddenly don't know how to count. The opposition in these matters, exaggerate a lot.

23. Everyone can see it's a fake 18k people. The number is more likely, 150k.

24. Don't lose sleep over it. It's natural for the government to underestimate while the opposition overestimates. Biasa lah .

25. We must see the gathering for what it represents. It's a midterm recall of the support for the mad-dani government. The danger is, the recall may be infectious.

26. Many of us felt nauseous when the PM tried a reverse psychology crap.

26(b). Thanking the gatherers for a peaceful demo and be safe going back. Loya nya .

27. The government and the PM in particular must take heed at the anger and dissatisfaction the gathering represents. Whether explicitly articulated by Hamzah et al or scantily said (like the girls in Brazilian bikini) who the ecclesiastical warlords are secretly salivating at.

28. Now, let me say what's wrong with this gathering. It's just a Woodstock concert laced mostly with screams of turun Anwar, interspaced with selected zikir and shouts of Allahuakbar

29. Have you noticed the fact the gathering was predominantly made of 1 race - malays. It was inescapable the the interests that dominated the gathering would be Malay centric.

30. By necessity the talk at the gathering would be dominated by 2 issues, Uber nationalism and Uber religious. Both issues being crowd pleasing. Indeed these issues actually dominated the gathering.

31. Some of us, mostly idealistic armchair critics, imagined that such a gathering will talk about reforms, abuse of power, the rise of the rentier, rent seekers,the profiteers , crony capitalism, corruption and so on. Unfortunately no! Some everyday matters like inflation , cost of living were lightly touched. That's about all. It must have been a huge disappointment.

32. But it should not surprised many of us too. This was a gathering organized by politicians and the crowd attending were mostly gullible fools ready to go ballistic.

33. We have to face the facts that politicians just want to score political points. They will play the gallery and talk of things that amplify and inflate the shouts of turun Anwar turun.

34. They will never talked about wide ranging reforms that we would like to have been talked about.

35. We must remember that the majority who attended the gathering are reactionaries who are interested to retain and maintain the status quo instead of overthrowing them.

36. I for one,won't expect any earth shattering revelations from the reactionaries. They are just Gucci communists pretending they are looking out for the interest of basically Malays. Their stories were just rhetorics.

37. Would Mahathir, mahiuddin, Hamzah et al speak about reforms to dismantle the economic structures they helped create and perpetuate?

38. The monopolistic businesses, the license - wallahs, the luxury of choosing who gets ahead and who is left behind and the elephant in the room, the NEP in it's new form? No lah!

39. Not until hell freezes over, pigs can fly or water can be squeezed from stone.

40. They won't speak about reforms extensively, fearing doing so will invite more diligent scrutiny which will expose their hypocrisy.

41. In fact,they liked it when Anwar procrastinates and stalls. They believe Anwar is the axe that comes into the forest .

42. I have many more to say about the gathering but will not write about them. That and other articles will not be posted in my blog. 76 other articles will appear in a book hopefully that will be published soon.

Tweet

Read more...

Hippie politicians and the Woodstock concert. Contrarian essays no 23.

1. Hajjah nurulizzah has committed the biggest political faux pas. She walked with lawyers in the walk for judicial independence. A few weeks ago .

2. It showed her noviceness as the newly minted PKR deputy president.

3. It was a PR exercise designed to endear herself. To a few besotted lawyers. Even bashful ones .

4. Some of these young lovers err lawyers were pleased the Hajjah took photos with them . Some maybe could not sleep that night .

5. But absentmindedly Hajjah NIA forgot the reason for the walk.

6. The lawyers organized the walk demanding judicial independence. It's anti alleged executive interference in judicial appointments.

7. She forgot the issue has been weaponised by the opposition political parties. By Anwar haters and people on the lunatic fringe.

8. Weaponised to unseat her father, the mamak padukang, Anvar Ebraheem.

9. Don't believe me? Look at how he dresses for Friday prayers. Exactly like a mamak padukang maybe complete with green canvas belt full of IOU papers.

10. Even Dr Mahathir, a bona fide descendant of malabar mamaks looked more Malay in baju melayu.

11. She gave moral support for the walkers which meant she gave moral support to the political parties seeking to unseat her father .

12. The "sin' she committed is greater than the wrong did by the renegade 9 in calling for a RCI on judicial interference. She deserves a more severe reprimand for her intransigence.

13. We can be sure , the hajjahs presence at the walk of the singing canaries will be used as cannon fodder by the political demagogues and firebrands at the concert this 26th of July .

14. That will be the political Woodstock to be attended by under the cannabis influence political hippies from the opposition political parties, self righteous lawyers and people from the lunatic fringe.

15. A pity a young striptease queen, Rose Chan is not there. She would have been the main attraction. People come to see her rather that Hadi or mahiuddin

16. PAS leaders will cover their faces with their hands but will peep through their fingers to look see the sensuous gyrations of Ms Chan.

17. In her heydays, Rose Chan was more popular than Tun Razak around the campuses at UM. She must have eased the puberty passage for many then.

18. She was the subject of many bawdy jokes around UM campuses, that is until the Muslim evangelists controlled the campuses .

19. Others can't, but the evangelists kept pictures of Rose Chan in their rooms to relieve themselves. Haha

20. Here's a troubling thing. The people going to the Woodstock concert themed turun Anwar are going there with an UMNO state of mind.

21. By UMNO state of mind,I mean the underlying belief you can always get everything for free.

22. UMNO has never heard of the phrase popularized by Milton Friedman, there's no such thing as a free lunch .

23. Which generally mean you can't get anything without expending efforts and sacrifices.

24. These things - work and sacrifices are not in UMNOs vocab.

25. Bossku Najib once told me a long time ago, there's nothing UMNO and Malays like better than getting things for free .

26. Like free felcra and risda shares, exclusive licenses to import onions, garlic , dried chillies, cattle, rice , supply of low quality Baja and so on.

27. So these people going to the Woodstock concert this Saturday think just by giving flammable speeches , arms flailing and generally Anwar bashing, Nana non will step down

28. Anvar Ebraheem, who has gone to jail , got whacked by a former IGP will likely stick up his middle finger and will say up yours.

29. Nah, he's not afraid of the conference of the howling wolves this Saturday.

30. But don't stop the gathering of the hippy politicians at the Woodstock concert.

31. Treat the Anwar bashing outpourings as a wake up call to rectify his shortcomings.

32. Anwar and the PKR yahoo boys and girls must realize that pak Sheikh is not the best in this or that

33. Maybe the bestest tongue twister . Birds flying up high can come eat from his hands. Girls fully clothed can stand full Monty in front of him .

34. People at the Woodstock concert will shout themselves coarse screaming turun Anwar, turun turun but won't talk on a number of things.

35. Won't talk because doing so would be suicidal for them.

36. They won't talk about wide ranging economic reforms. If Anwar procrastinates, the opposition won't at all.

37. Like dismantling monopolies, licences, exclusive contracts etc.

38. Imagine breaking up PETRONAS, Tnb, khazanah, EPF, dismantling monopolies in the supply of baja, in import of rice, in withdrawing licenses to import garlic, onions, shallots etc.

39. While they make out as though they are speaking for the interest of the common people, they are actually protecting the rentier class, the rent seekers , the profiteers and the capitalists.

40. Hence, they won't be talking about wide ranging economic reforms.

41. They won't be talking about reforms in education too.

42. Will they dare talk about admissions to universities based on merits, remove the quota system etc? No they won't because their own racial bias curtails them .

43. I say, the Woodstock concert this Saturday is just a big red herring. While it's just Anwar bashing, the real issues remain hidden purposely.

Tweet

Read more...

A Shakespearean comedy of errors. Contrarian essays no 22

1. Anwar Ibrahim must be shaking in his LV loafers upon hearing the a congregation of lawyers will issue him a warning about judicial interference or about anything else bad attributable to anwars governance.

2. Such congregations will amount to nothing. Yes the lawyers will give their congregation a respectable name, walk for this or that .

3. A memorandum will probably be given to a doorman. Posted but not read by the actual addressee.

4. In the congregation, lawyers who have not seen each other for sometime will exchange gossips .

5. There will be whispers that judge X is bonking that nubile young lawyer Y. Wow!

6. It's a congregation of the legal bourgeoisie. The Hampstead and the limousine liberals.

7. How I wish , lawyers would group together and form their own political party, made up of entirely lawyers . Parti Pegu Demokratik Malaysia.

8. Then, let's see how many of them make to parliament.

9. There, they can argue until the cows come home about the source that gives rise to suspicions about judicial interference. That blasted 'upon advice by the PM '.

10. Once they get into parliament they can then persuade two thirds of MPs to alter the constitution. Have that blasted provision of 'upon the advice of the PM ' removed .

11. Upon removal of that blasted provision there will be no more allegations of executive interference in not only judicial appointments but also in other instances where such provision exists .

12. But then, deprivation of the luxury of the ability to bitch around the allegations of executive interference would make life boring, wouldn't it?

13. Life for women lawyers would be unbearable especially. Male lawyers can at least bitched about judicial sexual trysts.

14. Aiyya!

15. So whether lawyers walk for this or that or participate in the turun Anwar jamboree, the lawyers gathering will amount to nothing!

16. In fact lawyers' focus on the seriousness of any particular issue can dissipate once you put in a distracting agent.

17. For example, look at the recent lawyers' walk for judicial independence. The presence of the darling of reformati, appears to take the sting away from the solemness of the event.

18. When the axe enters the forest, the trees say of the axe, it's one of us for the handle is made of wood.

19. Some lawyers are so pleased and besotted with nurulizzah that they took pictures with her. Some probably got wet dreams later that night.

20. Lawyers can be politically naive too . The walk was weaponised by some political parties to dethrone Anwar.

21. By inference, if nurulizzah gave moral support to the walk, she's giving moral too to the opposition.

22. As in the walk, if lawyers participate in the turun Anwar thingy, the lawyers will serve as useful idiots.

23. Why don't these lawyers organized their own turun Anwar 24. ' concert'. See if people support them or spit and throw up at them.

25. People will know it's just a gathering of limousine and LV liberals and idealists who pretend to be self righteous.

26. By the way, nurulizzah committed a serious faux pas.

27. She said she's walking with the lawyers as a private citizen . Let's hope the people will retain her as a private citizen anywhere she contests. Apa macam?

28. That means the renegade 9 can also participate in the turun Anwar event as private citizens.

29. See whether the PKR SUA will take appropriate action against nurulizzah or the renegade 9. If she's not sleeping of course.

30. So, lawyers don't act as keeper of our conscience. We know you smile like a Cheshire cat, when we say, not cheese but say fees .

31. Don't be offended ya. Some lawyers are my good friends. 4 of siblings are lawyers as are 2 of my 'chewren". But I must be harsh on them sometimes to provide them a reality check .

32. I once met param cumaraswamy . He served me black coffee. Kasi garang he says. I now drink lots of coffee. No soogar

Tweet

Read more...

The midget tattoo says, it's an addendum, it's an addendum, it's a titah. Contrarian essays no 21.

1. If all the UMNO divisions were to press the government to implement the substance of the addendum, it must say no.

2. How can the government be complicit in the furtherance of a crime? How can the court does so?

3. As for UMNO, who cares! It has shown it has total disregard for the law. Unless it profits them .

4. Let umno digs its own grave. We will happily give it the last rites .

5. Mari kita ramai2 talqinkan UMNO!

6. In writing about the judiciary issue, I said I am prepared to accept a judicial Phillips curve.

7. Type B judiciary replaces type A judiciary.

8. The quality of judiciary decreases( it's a matter of subjective perception) but the conviction of high profile cases increases .

9. I can buy that. Dealing with mischiefs is better than being caught in philosophical arguments about judicial independence. Over cups of latte, ok la .

10. But I must quickly hasten to say that's it's a matter of subjective perception that the new judicial team is a type B team .

11. The new team headed by the new CJ, PCA and chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak maybe equally competent as the previous one .

12. The acid test will be how will they handle the high profile cases I mentioned in previous articles.

13. I have a few issues in mind. Will we see a quick refiling on the cases of those given DNAA, which the public see as unjust .

14. Can we see a robust and revolutionary over ruling of the ruling of the pardons board? I will give my reasons later

15. Can we see an inglorious end to the damn addendum issue?

16. Or horror of horrors, do we see the CJ having to recuse himself whenever cases involving UMNO people come up before him?

17. After all, he was an UMNO deputy minister once . Definitely there will be suspicions of biasness.

18. Let's start from the beginning. Start with the pardon by the pardons board. It's not quite constitutional. Here are my reasons.

19. It's legally incorporated yes but not enough constitutional.

20. It doesn't comprised of a number of federal court judges, the executive and a number of the legislature, excluding the idiotic FT minister.

21. It's not a microcosm of the 3 branches of government - the executive, legislature and the judiciary.

22. It's an inferior body and being such is subject to the oversight of the federal court. The FC can overrule or confirm its proceedings. Better to overrule them.

23. That means the pardon of the object causing the cause celebre is not quite valid!

24. But hold on feller, didn't the pardons board created by the constitution itself?

25. Yes, but surely the constitution does not intend to create a body that shoots it in the foot. Right?

26. If the legal stature of the pardons board is arguable, then it follows its proceedings and findings are also arguable.

27. It's careless to give this particular chap a pardon.

27(b). Further, we can't allow a body like the pardons board to usurp the powers of the executive legislature and judiciary. The federal court must stop this trespass.

27(c)..I would also like to ask this question. Pardon my ignorance. Does the authority of the pardons board extend to determining the place of incarceration?.

28. If there's none, the pardons board may be acting ultra vires.

29. The stature of the addendum is even more precarious. The stature of the pardons board it itself disputable, the stature of the addendum more fragile.

30. The addendum is a product of a contestable board. It's a separate, distinct and altogether another adjunct document.

31. It ought not be given the same legal stature as the main pardons board document. It wasn't done contemporaneously furthermore.

32. The stature of the addendum is not settled yet.

33. The najibers and UMNO are asking the government to implement a subject matter in a document not yet settled in law. Tablay itu maciam tamby!

34. The government too faces a serious believability problem

35. I was sure Saifuddin showed the minutes of the pardons board to all and sundry. There was no mention of an addendum.

36. When did he realize, aik ada addendum. If so, why didn't he make another PC? Very careless of him .

37. But what are we to do? Anwar likes to surround himself with idiots and morons. Perhaps to make him appear most intelligent.

38. Yes, the signs are clear to the government and the UMNO president.

39. That UMNO is full of shit- people who will disregard the law, unless it profits them.

40. If UMNO disregards the law, speak for itself, not for all Malaysians .

41. Because of these reasons, the government ought to ignore the addendum.

42. Don't you see the ridiculousness of the proposition? Let's assume the chap is placed under house arrest. Then he is found guilty of the charges of IMDb. Will he then be unceremoniously hauled back to Kajang spa resort?

43. The najibers and UMNO harken to the days when you cut open a lady's tummy to retrieve pieces of jackfruit taken from the sultan's orchard. Puhleez.

Tweet

Read more...

It's an addendum, an addendum. It's a titah. Part 1. Contrarian essays no 20.

1. It's a shitty thing . In the hands of UMNO people and the najibers, the 'addendum' has become and irritating instrument.

2. In their hands, it has become that damn ' addendum '.

3. The gangster like UMNO youth chief has lashed out at a DAP MP for urging the government to ignore umnos request to subvert the rule of law.

4. The rule of law and the supremacy of the law says that the same common law is applicable to everyone -i mean everyone. It's also universally accepted that no one is above the law.

5. We cannot say the law is not applicable to Najib or that he is above the law.

6. Disregard of the law, is the value that UMNO wants to impart to us.

7. All reasonable man should not countenance this teaching.

8. I am also not sure too if that lashing out , comes out from a rational mind. 9. It could have come out from disguised racism. The dap MP is Chinese. The Chinese shouldn't dispute what the master race wants .

10. It could be coming from the bullying nature of UMNO.

11. And to strengthen it's demand, UMNO is saying it's a decree, you dolt!

12. So you know what UMNO stands for. It stands for utter and flippant disregard for the rule of law and supremacy of the law.

13. And you think it's honourable in the name of race, religion and King to support UMNO?

14. Then, there is this argument about constitutional monarchy. It's a limited monarchy.

15. We are no longer living in ancient times where most malays were not politically aware and were servile.

16. Then, malays were living under the regime of absolute rule and absolute discretion. Every word of the sultan was everyone's command.

17. It was a time when you cut open a daimsels stomach to retrieve pieces of jackfruit taken from a tree grown in the kings orchard .

18. UMNO now actually doesn't give 2 hoots about titah, but it's weaponised to achieve it's nefarious aim .

19. It's nefarious because it's used to achieve an illegal act .

20. The illegal act being to apply political pressure and herd instincts to free a convicted felon.

21. Surely you don't want to teach you children the value of disregard for the rule of law and supremacy of the law.

22. The principle of constitutional democracy does not allow you to categorize people into loyals and disloyals.

23. The logic is this. If the conduct of the king is constrained by the constitution then more so his decree, commands, verbal issues are constrained by the laws of the land.

24. Labelling others as derhaka, treasonous and so on are only UMNO devices , demonizing others who disagree with them.

25. Loyalty is not the monopoly of UMNO. Don't allow UMNO to categorise others as disloyal more so than the king intended. A just king wouldn't summarily label anyone as disloyal without doing much more. Only UMNO likes to bully and terrorizes others .

26. Disagreeing with the titah addendum is not necessarily being disloyal or treasonous. Loyalty is ones total conduct, behavior and reverence to the King not just verbal admissions.

27. We must be mindful about what the najibers and UMNO are doing. Subvert the law to exonerate convict. By using the titah as an excuse and political pressure to achieve their heinous aim.

28. Now, it's using the king because it's advantageous to do so. UMNO will be the first to turn against king when it is opportune to do so.

29. As said above, this addendum is weaponised to hide it's racism, to divide the people into loyals and treasonous people and use addendum to exonerate a criminal. How can a titah be used to support a crime?

30. In the next part, we will look at the addendum from an unconventional point of view.

Tweet

Read more...

The Judicial Hocus pocus. Contrarian essays no 19.

1. You all can see the farce of it all. Rafizi may have initially raised the issue of judicial appointments. He called for a RCI.

2. The issue was hijacked. Embellished, amplified and exaggerated. It was given more prominence than it should.

3. Political parties, NGOs, the lunatic fringe, Anwar haters have escalated the issue calling it a crisis .

4. The latest, I see is the formation of a secretariat. Headed unofficially by centenarian Dr M .

5. But Dr M must come to equity with clean hands.

6. When doc M sacked tun salleh abas and other justices, that event was more of a crisis then the present one.

7. Then , he was more interested to have as CJ a malleable person who would agree to his gentler requests .

8. If Dr m wanted a pliant judiciary, what makes anwars conduct, if he advises the JAC any different?

9. Which makes the hastily creation of a secretariat like a pot calling the kettle black.

10. The present case in which we see, slowness in naming a CJ and other federal court justices, hardly constitutes a crisis.

11. Do we see the sky falling down , people dropping off in the streets and rampaging?

12. Hello, cost of living going up, prices of food skyrocketing, cost of utilities, petrol, lack of FDI, growing national debt are crises .

13. No secretariat for these nor were there for a corruption free judiciary, secretariat for stiffer penalties for corruption, no house arrest and so on .

14. The weaponisation of this issue, ie using it as an excuse demanding that Anwar steps down is politicising it.

15. The amplification, embellishing and exaggeration of the issue are done by the UMNO portals and other portals specializing in the spreading of lies and misinformation.

16. By the way isnt ,the thought of demanding that Anwar steps down , just by gratuitously asking him to do so, is an UMNO way of thinking?

17. Isn't asking things for free, free loading and believing UMNO people are entitled to get what they demand, is UMNO way of thinking?

18. So when groups, NGOs, political parties and now a secretariat ask Anwar to turun, just by verbally asking , they are actually following UMNO footsteps?

19. You think you can get something automatically and entitled to, without exerting efforts and sacrifices?

20. Have you all heard of the saying, popularized by the great economist Milton Friedman, there's no such thing as a free lunch?

21. In general, you don't get something without efforts and sacrifices.

22. In this case, not by talking cock and screaming demands.

23. Do something substantive like organizing nation wide protests, moving a motion of no confidence or winning an election.

24. You think by just talking, scratching balls and marching hand in hand you get, hey presto, the mamak padukang steps down ?

25. In an earlier article, I said I am prepared to accept a judicial Phillips curve.

26. That is, Anwar by any conduct such as having a Tete a Tete with the JAC, manages to install a CJ and other justices, the judiciary carries out a number of 'suchs'.

27. But I doubt the new judiciary will carry them out as Anwar appears intent at preserving the bourgeois status quo .

28. Apparently hes not the reformasist, we think he is. He's a LV liberal after all.

29. The only way to knock some senses in him is for you to exercise your options at the next GE. Ada butot?

30. Finally and this my opinion only, the judicial institution is not worth over protecting and over championed of.

31. It has enough highly intelligent people to take care of themselves through their artful arguments.

32. The judiciary is not a sacred cow institution we think it is. There's data showing that the incidence and prevalence of corruption there is highest, higher than even the legislature

33. It's better to organize lawyers walk for a corruption free judiciary or walk for merits based judicial appointments. The secretariat does the same too.

34. Also I think many of these organisations now talking about judicial independence are a big bloody farce and are duplicitous.

35. Just suppose that Anwar, suffering from temporary non compos mentis, appoints a non Malay CJ.

36. You can be sure that many of these groups talking sanctimoniously about judicial shit, will make a big ruckus.

37. Doctor m will say , see the Anwar government is dictated by the DAP.

Tweet

Read more...

What is to done? Let me story you ( biar saya cerita pada you) Contrarian essays no 18.

1. I won't talk about defending the lofty ideals of independence of the judiciary and defending the ideal of judicial appointments. Others more qualified than I, can talk about that .

2. I refuse to weaponise the present judicial uproar to hit at the mamak padukang who on every Friday will be in a well dhobi prayers attire.

3. There are ample grounds with which to wallop Anvar Ebraheem. Breaking the faith of people believing him as a change agent, the many promises not kept, the betrayal of reformasi and so on .

4. The judiciary as an institution isn't worth over defending and protected. It's not the sacred cow as we think it is .

5. Corruption is rampant and the cancer is also ravaging it.

6. I hear the lawyers through their brown shirted organization will do a walk for the judiciary.

7. I'd rather participate in a walk for a corruption free judiciary, or walk for the affirmation of the rule of law and supremacy of the law, or lawyers against house arrest and the like.

8. But as usual, these lawyers who think highly of themselves, will organize a walk in support of some hazy cause and expect the people to support them! Up yours!

9. It will be a circus. After the walk, some will adjourn to the Selangor club and other watering holes , drink copious amounts of beer and engage in table thumping debates.

10. Others will adjourn to some cafes, sipped latte and also engage in animated debates. A lawyers job is done isn't it?

11. That's the conduct of the cafe latte socialists, the Hampstead liberals, the LV and Limousine liberals, the smoked salmon and gauge caviar leftists, the Gucci communists and the Birkin bitches.

12. We don't like the changing of the guards. Since it does not follow a set of rules which WE think it ought to follow it must be wrong. Itu maciam?

13. Type B justice and grade C egg standard judges replace type A justice and grade A egg standard judges, we don't like it. Can that transition be called a judicial crisis?

14. If we don't like it, move a motion of no confidence against Anwar Ibrahim or punish him accordingly in the 16th GE.

15. Its a lot safer for me to stick to the politics of the issue.

16. I have told that PKR can do 2 things. Sack the renegade 9 or does nothing but eat humble pie .

17. What the renegade 9 did amounted to gross insubordination and actually is a revolt.

18. The only option opened to PKR,if it has honour, self pride and amour propre, is to sack the renegade 9 .

19. As it turns out, PKR chose to swallow it's pride and does nothing except strenuously and unconvincingly say, it accepts the conduct of the renegade 9 with an open heart

20. How artificial and farcical this response is. If that conduct was carried out by a stray member, that person would unhesitatingly be kicked out of PKR. This was done by Rafizi and gang, all MPs. So it must be treated gingerly .

21. PKRs reaction confirms me that it is a pondan party. No self respect, no honour and no amour propre.

22. It can only u ashamedly say , we accept with an open heart. We are a party that celebrates difference of opinions. FU la.

23. It's like the victim saying to the rapist. Do whatever you want, but do it gently - I am still a virgin. See, I open up my legs. You will get abused anyway and will be repeatedly.

24. Please forgive that macabre analogy. Please ladies and gentlemen.

25. You will notice a number of things wrong with PKRs response .

26. PKRs response was made by a member of its politburo. By the thuggish and fart faced home minister.

27. Not by any of the VPs or by the newly minted DP.

28. Two things can be read from there. First, Rafizis criticisms are treated as trivial . That being so, Rafizi can respond with more toxic criticisms.

29. Let's see how open hearted and magnanimous PKR is .

30. 2ndly, Saifuddin is so thicky, he doesn't realize he's an expendable material.

31. If anything goes wrong with his response, he will be blamed for it..what if now the component parties of the unity government come out with their criticisms?

32. Would PKR still be open hearted and remains a party that celebrates difference in opinions? Tiu kaw!

33. Eventually and ultimately, PKR would have to sack the renegade 9. It has to do this to show it's a party that has discipline, self respect and amour propre.

34. And Rafizi and gang will not be rushing to join the reactionary parties like UMNO, pas or bersatu. Rafizi once shook hands with me but refused to do so with azmin following that, giving the excuse his hands are dirty. But he just shook hands with me.

35. Rafizi and gang will remain as independent MPs. He won't be curtailed in any way in his criticisms.

36. In the meantime, it would be prudent for Rafizi to ask his friends who are already members of any political party to form a new political party.

37. To get ready a vehicle to participate in the 16th GE.

38. PKR would have to send someone to pacify and persuade Rafizi. Who can it send?

39. It cannot send Kak Wan who will be regarded as guilty by association. Nor can send the new PKR leadership which will be regarded as too antagonistic.

40. PKR cannot send DAP people whom Rafizi does not trust. He has said so previously.

41. It can only send AMANAH people. Not bang mat whom Rafizi regards as a buffoon and a court jester .

42. The only 2 people whom Rafizi respects are possibly Dr dzulkefli and Khalid samad.

43. That's why I say the array of choices available to Rafizi are so numerous that they eclipse the intrigues of a Cao Cao and the brilliance of a Zhuge Liang.

Tweet

Read more...